CRUCIAL
LIFE ISSUES BILLS of 2003
December 2003
The following bills of the
California State Legislature deal with crucial life issues of abortion,
infanticide, euthanasia or cloning. For each bill a brief analysis and the
pro-life voting position are given. The principle analyst for each bill is
shown: CLC (California Life Coalition), CPLC (California ProLife), CRTL
(California Right to Life), LPN (Life Priority Network), or SIB (Scholl
Institute of Bioethics). The final disposition of each bill is stated.
SENATE
BILLS
SB
2 (Burton - D), Health Care Coverage - OPPOSE
Promotes universal health insurance with uniform employer health care
coverage that would substantially expand the number of Californians with state
mandated and controlled health care coverage.
The author states that the measure would "create a level playing
field for all businesses in California."
The state will dictate all coverage while requiring the private sector
business owners to pay for it, which will include family planning and abortion
services. - CRTL.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
SB
53 (Chesbro - D), 2003-04 Budget - OPPOSE
See AB 1765, Budget Act of 2003, for opposition rationale. Five amendments to
SB 53 were offered to restrict abortion funding but were tabled by Democrat
party-line vote. - LPN.
Completely revised and rewritten as a bill on Public Employees'
Retirement.
SB
71 (Kuehl - D), Ed: sexual health and HIV/AIDS prevention instruction - OPPOSE
SB 71 would amend, revise, and repeal major portions of the California
Education Code that deal with sex education, and replace it with a consolidated
sexual health and HIV/AIDS prevention education act. SB 71 proposes to teach
that abstinence from sexual intercourse is the only certain way to prevent
sexually transmitted diseases (as is presently written into the Ed Code), but
then to provide information on other methods of preventing pregnancy. These
other methods are not described, but typically include contraceptives, condoms,
'outercourse', alternative lifestyles, and when all else fails, abortion. SB 71
requires some form of sex education from grades K-12, inclusive. - LPN.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
SB
133 (Battin - R), Human cloning - SUPPORT
The California Health and Safety Code prohibits human reproductive
cloning. As defined therein, "human reproductive cloning means the creation
of a human fetus," which is that stage of development that begins at an
individual's eighth week of life. Thus,
"human reproductive cloning" by default allows the creation of,
experimentation on, and killing of human beings before their eighth week of
life. SB 133 would remove "human reproductive cloning" from the Health
and Safety Code and would prohibit cloning a human being with no exceptions. -
LPN.
Failed in the Senate Health and
Human Services Committee.
SB
139 (Brulte - R), Abandoned newborns: safe-surrender - SUPPORT
SB 139 offers helpful technical amendments to the Safe Arms for Newborns
statute successfully authored by Senator Brulte in 2000. The original statute
allows for surrender of a baby up to 72 hours old with anonymity and without
fear of prosecution for abandonment. SB
139 would allow for safe surrender of the child to sites as designated by county
boards of supervisors, rather than to designated individuals at the sites, and
requires that safe-surrender sites post signs informing the public of this
confidential option. - CPLC.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
SB
142 (Alpert - D), Medi-Cal to Healthy Families Accelerated Enrollment - OPPOSE
Would accelerate enrollment of an estimated 42,000 children each year who
are below age 19 into the Medi-Cal program, which provides full reproductive
services including contraceptives and abortion without parental notification or
consent. This is an induction program that family planners and abortionists will
love. - LPN.
Held in the Senate Appropriations Committee under
submission.
SB
267 (Knight - R), Abstinence Education - SUPPORT
Promotes abstinence as the only assured successful method of preventing
unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. Directs the State
Department of Health Services to develop an abstinence education program in a
manner to maximize federal financial participation. - CRTL.
Failed in the Senate Health and Human
Services Committee.
SB
322 (Ortiz - D), Stem cell research proposals - OPPOSE
Existing law permits the derivation of human embryonic stem cells and
human embryonic germ cells, both of which necessitate killing a human being in
the embryonic stage of development. This bill would establish a stem cell
institutional review board to review and approve proposals for stem cell
research projects. No review board can justify the killing of innocent human
beings and this bill would provide a false legitimacy for research that does so.
Note: The bill as sent to the Governor contained a flaw that made it unworkable
as written- LPN.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
SB
473 (Florez - D), Public schools: State School Health Advisory Council - OPPOSE
Superintendent of Public Instruction would establish a State School
Health Advisory Council to recommend school health services as well as school
nursing services. $144,000 would be available for involving members of the
education and health groups. Such groups would include youth groups, HMOs, and
California Assembly of School-Based Health Care. They will determine what
services are appropriate to the school venue and what nursing services should be
required. Consider the movement to
make contraceptives available on school grounds under the auspices of nurses and
perhaps even medical personnel assistants. - CRTL.
Hearing canceled at the request
of the author.
SB
490 (Alpert - D), Pharmacy: prescriptions - OPPOSE
This bill would authorize
pharmacists to furnish emergency contraceptive drug therapy in accordance with a
protocol approved by the California State Board of Pharmacy and the Medical
Board of California as an alternative to developing a protocol with an
authorized prescriber who is acting within his or her scope of practice. Hence,
it expands the ability of pharmacists to furnish emergency contraceptives. It
also requires the pharmacist to receive specified training before furnishing
this drug therapy. The fundamental problems are that emergency contraceptive
drugs are abortifacient and pharmacist training, which can be as little as 1
hour, does not equip the pharmacist with an ability to clinically assess the
condition of the contraceptive user. - LPN.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
SB
545 (Speier - D), Emergency contraceptive drug therapy - OPPOSE
This bill would eliminate the requirement to train pharmacists before
they could initiate emergency contraceptive drug therapy. It further reduces the
medical standards for chemical abortions and permits administering a drug
regimen with no prior physical examination or medical background assessment of
the woman. Emergency contraception prevents implantation of the embryo into the
uterus and thus kills that developing human being. SB 545 would force a pharmacy
that participates in the state Medi-Cal program to offer emergency
contraceptives even against the moral objection of employed pharmacists. - LPN.
Passed by the Legislature and signed by
Governor Davis.
SB
771 (Ortiz - D), Human cells: embryo registry: egg cell donation - OPPOSE
This bill would put California state government in the stem cell and
cloning research business. Contrary to federal policy which prohibits federal
funding of embryonic stem cell research and has discontinued federal research
involving the killing of human embryos, and which likely will stop human
cloning, SB 771 establishes a state research plan to enhance commercial,
academic, and governmental expansion in all of these research areas. This
proposed rebuff of federal policy explicitly deals with human embryos and
oocytes (human eggs), creating a state-run repository for them from which they
are given to "any Californian resident who submits an [acceptable] research
plan."
The bill also forces physicians, under threat of being charged with
unprofessional conduct if non-compliant, to provide fertility patients with
information on how to donate eggs and embryos to the state repository. SB 771
seeks human egg donors despite acknowledging the "risk of decreased
fertility and risks associated with using drugs, medication and hormones
prescribed for ovarian stimulation during the oocyte donation process." -
LPN.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
SB
778 (Ortiz - D), Biomedical Research and Development Act of 2004 - OPPOSE
President
Bush had banned, after August 9, 2001, the federal funding of stem cell research
that involves human embryos. SB 778 seeks California bonds to fund California
research for regenerative medical therapies, which relies heavily on human
embryos and clones and ultimately results in killing these human beings. This
proposed Biomedical Research and Development Act of 2004 is a fiscal ploy to use
California taxpayers to fund an immoral program, much like using taxpayers to
fund abortion through the state Medi-Cal program. - LPN.
Held in the Senate
Appropriations Committee under submission.
SB
932 (Bowen - D), Non-profit corporations, health facilities - OPPOSE
This bill would prohibit the Attorney General from consenting
to a health facility agreement or transaction if the seller restricts the type
or level of medical services that may be provided at the health facility by the
buyer. Hence, a church-affiliated non-profit hospital that does not do abortions
could not sell or otherwise dispose of its assets if it does so with the proviso
that abortions not be performed by the buyer. This is an attack on religious
beliefs and private property. - LPN.
Passed by the Legislature and signed by Governor Davis.
ASSEMBLY
BILLS
AB
9 (Dymally - D), Urban Community Health Institute - OPPOSE
This bill addresses the issue of "health disparities."
In the process of identifying these "disparities" or
inequalities in certain populations, community-based organizations and
partnerships become an integral component.
One objective is to strengthen "partnerships among community-based
organizations in multicultural areas...."
Planned Parenthood is a member of the California Primary Care Association
that is affiliated with the Pacific West Cluster of the Health Disparities
Collaborative. Planned Parenthood
is active in minority neighborhoods promoting abortion and family planning
services. - CRTL.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
AB
100 (Oropeza - D), 2003-04 Budget - OPPOSE
See AB 1765, Budget Act of 2003, for opposition rationale. - LPN.
Assembly motion made to
reconsider.
AB
267 (Mullin - D), Cloning: humans - OPPOSE
This bill would remove one of two definitions of human cloning which were
part of the phony ban on human cloning passed by the California Legislature last
year (SB 1230 - Alpert). AB 267 would delete the prohibition against cloning a
human being and would permit human cloning, experimentation and tissue
harvesting until the age of 8 weeks when the clone technically becomes a fetus,
after which the clone would not be allowed to live. The bill also permits
un-elected bureaucrats to change regulations on defining human reproductive
cloning which could result in increasing the maximum age of clones before being
killed. - CPLC/LPN.
Assembly Health Committee
hearing cancelled by the bill author.
AB
368 (Chan - D), Healthy Families Program: LEA billing option - OPPOSE
Under this bill, family planning and abortion services for minors without
parental consent will be facilitated more easily.
Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) would be entitled to receive
reimbursement for health services during school through the Healthy Families
Program. Young women, who may be
involved in unplanned pregnancies, are very vulnerable to school personnel who
might suggest an abortion. Abortions
could then be obtained through a school-linked health center with reimbursement
from public dollars. This process does not assure parental involve-ment and
could replace parents with the school and its personnel as substitute parents. -
CRTL.
Assembly Appropriations
Committee hearing cancelled by the bill author.
AB
561 (Lieber - D), Family planning: teen pregnancy - OPPOSE
AB 561 would permanently embed numerous Planned Parenthood programs
within the Office of Family Planning (OFP), specifically, their TeenSMART
Program, Male Involvement Program, Community Challenge Grants Program, and the
Information and Education Program. The OFP has long been a conduit of funding
for the abortion trade, especially Planned Parenthood. The author's office
stated that by codifying these programs, the state will ensure that the
structure of these programs is maintained in the future, without mandating
funding. - LPN.
Passed by the
Legislature and signed by Governor Davis.
AB
930 (Mountjoy - R), Sexual abuse - SUPPORT
This bill would require medical personnel, including abortionists and
their assistants, to report to authorities minor girls who are pregnant or who
have a sexually transmitted disease. These conditions imply that a criminal
offense may have occurred. Usually the male involved is an adult who lures or
coerces minor girls into sexual intimacy. The abortion industry uses
confidentiality as an excuse for not reporting this statutory rape. The criminal
act is then covered up by an abortion that kills the baby, devastates the girl,
and lets the predator go free to prey on other victims.
Two contrary laws are at the crux of the current problem: 1) the need to
report and prosecute the infraction of law and 2) patient confidentiality which
prevents reporting the infraction. The California Attorney General has given
legal advice to the California Medical Board at their request and they have
essentially absolved the medical profession of reporting unless certain other
information about the girl and man involved is known or determined. AB 930 would
clarify the issue and relieve doctors of a policing investigator's role presumed
by the Medical Board. - LPN.
Changed by bill author to a
two-year bill to be considered in January 2004.
AB
996 (Wiggins - D), Insurance - OPPOSE
This bill amends the penal code to include bombing and arson of abortion
clinics and other facilities as terrorism punishable by state imprisonment and
fine. Then in a section unrelated to bombing and arson, terrorism is redefined
by the bill to include the following language:
"As used in this section, "terrorizing" means to cause a
person of ordinary emotions and sensibilities to fear for personal safety and
includes the systematic harassment of medical personnel working at a health
facility licensed under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1250) of the Health
and Safety Code, or any place where medical care is provided by a licensed
health care professional, that provides abortion services."
The qualification that the abortionist must feel fear is subjective,
over-broad, and susceptible to abuse by abortionists. Pro-life protestors who
engage in legal picketing activities (such as residential picketing, for
example, an activity routinely characterized as harassment by many abortionists)
could be reclassified as terrorists under this bill. Since State and Federal
laws already exist that criminalize bombings and arsons, this bill is
unnecessary and potentially chilling to the First Amendment rights of
pro-lifers. - CLC.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
AB
1109 (Maddox - R), Justifiable homicide: defense of a fetus - SUPPORT
Would add the word "fetus" to existing law to enable necessary
force to protect the pre-born child from wrongful injury. - CRTL.
Re-referred to Assembly
Committee on Judiciary.
AB
1041 (Runner - R), Parental consent for release from school - SUPPORT
This bill would require parental consent prior to releasing a student
from school. Many schools allow students to leave school grounds without
parental knowledge or permission for confidential medical services which include
counseling, access to contraceptives and abortion. - CPLC.
Failed in the Assembly Health Committee.
AB
1166 (Berg - D), Residential facilities: terminally ill persons. -- OPPOSE
This bill allows residential facilities to not call emergency services
(911) for inpatients that are receiving hospice services.
If the patient is truly terminally ill as defined by the original hospice
entry requirements and is fully informed, then it is appropriate not to request
emergency services at the time of impending death occurring in the expected
course of the terminal illness.
There is, however, a proviso (5f) that the facility "need not call
emergency response services at the time of a life-threatening emergency".
Formulated too broadly and in an unqualified way, this proviso creates a danger
of unnecessary loss of life. It certainly should not apply to incidental
life-threatening occurrences (such as a fall, electrical shock, aspiration of
food into the lungs, choking, etc.) Also, if the patient only has an
"incurable progressive illness" as defined in AB 1299, then non-dying
disabled patients could be potentially denied basic emergency care. - SIB.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
AB
1299 (Daucher - R), Hospice - originally OPPOSE, now NO POSITION
AB 1299 was a particularly dangerous bill that would have far-reaching
consequences detrimental to the safety and lives of the people of California.
The proposed change in Hospice Licensure Act would allot hospice care (thus,
palliative care only) to the broad category of patients with "incurable
progressive disease". People who fall under this definition are by no means
dying, can expect many more years of life, and need efficient medical treatment
of all intercurrent and concomitant illness.
Under AB 1299 a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (an incurable
progressive illness), unjustly labeled as "hospice patient", would be
denied treatment for a pneumonia, a urinary infection, a cardiac arrhythmia, a
hip fracture or any other perfectly treatable medical emergency. All efforts
should be undertaken to defeat this anti-life bill. - SIB.
The bill has been revised by the
author to eliminate its unacceptable elements discussed above. Senate Health and
Human Services Committee hearing cancelled by the bill author.
AB
1528 (Cohn - D), Healthy California Act of 2003 - OPPOSE
Would require "universal" employer participation in ensuring
health care for all Californians. A
"uniform benefit package" would be required which would be
"universally available without barriers."
Abortion services and family planning services would be integral
components. Parental consent and/or
notification for minors would not be possible.
Consider the cumbersome financial burden upon the small and medium-sized
business owners. - CRTL.
Passed by the Legislature and
signed by Governor Davis.
AB
1762 (Committee on Budget), Health - OPPOSE
The state Medical Providers Interim Fund pays Medi-Cal providers for
costs incurred prior to September 1 of that year in which a budget has not yet
been enacted. This bill would revise the application of that provision to also
permit payments from the fund to the providers during the period in which Medi-Cal
has a deficiency, thus constituting an appropriation. Medi-Cal pays for
abortions, thus this bill constitutes open-ended funding of abortion. Note: Five
amendments to this bill were offered to restrict abortion funding but were
tabled by Democrat party-line vote. - LPN.
Passed
by the Legislature and signed by Governor Davis.
AB 1765 (Committee on Budget), Budget Act of 2003 - OPPOSE
The state budget contains unrestricted Medi-Cal and managed health
care abortion funding of ~$40
million for ~120,000 elective abortions annually. Collateral damage to women,
their families and taxpayers includes more ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages,
premature births and infertility; more serious and costly mental and physical
handicaps in subsequent "wanted children"; increased risk of breast
cancer; and more post abortion syndrome including post abortion suicides. Many
of these taxpayer-funded abortions are committed on minor daughters behind
parents' backs to cover up statutory rape and unreported sexual abuse.
Additionally,
~$60 million goes to the Genetic Disease Testing Fund, a substantial portion of
which is a search and destroy program used for the detection of handicapped
preborn children with the intent of killing them with late term abortions.
Another ~$30 million goes to teen pregnancy programs, most of which are Planned
Parenthood-type programs that distribute birth control drugs and devices to
minors behind their parents' backs. When these fail, abortion is most often the
final solution. - LPN.
Passed
by the Legislature and signed by Governor Davis.
AJR
2 (Jackson - D), Reproductive rights: Roe
v. Wade. - OPPOSE
AJR 2 proposes to "celebrate 30 years of Roe v Wade" and to
memorialize the President and Congress to uphold the intent and substance of Roe
v Wade. This despite more unborn children being killed each year by abortion
than Americans killed in all wars combined (over 1.5 million); despite a 30
percent increase in breast cancer incidence rate since 1973; despite numerous
women dying from "safe, legal abortions" since 1973; and despite more
subsequent ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, premature births, infertility,
chronic depression and suicides among aborting women than those who carry a
pregnancy to term. AJR 2 exhibits a fanaticism that is blind to the devastation
of Roe v Wade. - LPN.
Passed by the Legislature and
chaptered.
- end -
Compiled by Life Priority Network: [email protected]